Ebook Download Principles of Modern Chemistry
Well, now let's see exactly how the book will exist for you. Principles Of Modern Chemistry is the one that could affect you to have better time to kick back. So, exactly what you get in the downtime is not only loosening up however additionally extra expertise. Expertise and also experience are very worthwhile and also they will certainly be timeless. The existence of this publication could support you to have that classic well worth. Very valuable and also beneficial are exactly what you could likewise get from reading this book.
Principles of Modern Chemistry
Ebook Download Principles of Modern Chemistry
After coming to be successful to end up checking out a book, have you been enough? As a book fan, it will certainly not suffice to review the book. Continue and also proceed! This is just what you should do to enhance and constantly create the expertise. Bok is one that will make you feel addicted. But, it remains in the favorable term. Discover the books that will certainly give favorable enhancement for you currently.
Connecting to the internet as well as starting to make deal in getting this publication can be done while having various other work or working or being someplace. Why? This time around, it is very easy for you to link web. When you intend to get guide while doing various other activities, you can see the web link as in this web site. It confirms that Principles Of Modern Chemistry is very easy to obtain via visiting this site.
To get this book Principles Of Modern Chemistry, you may not be so baffled. This is on the internet book Principles Of Modern Chemistry that can be taken its soft data. It is various with the online book Principles Of Modern Chemistry where you could purchase a book and after that the vendor will certainly send out the published book for you. This is the location where you can get this Principles Of Modern Chemistry by online as well as after having deal with buying, you can download Principles Of Modern Chemistry on your own.
To get Principles Of Modern Chemistry, no difficult system and no hard working to obtain this publication exist. Attach your computer system, laptop, or gadget with the web. Now, you can click the link as well as obtain download and install with the terms that remain in the link. After getting it as well as conserving the soft data of Principles Of Modern Chemistry, you could start and also handle where when you will review it. This is a very awesome activity to be behavior as well as a pastime.
Review
"I believe it is written well for an honors-level freshman chemistry course; i.e. it covers all of the basic material but in a way that is more thorough and intelligent than other introductory texts.""Excellent discussion of the basics from a scientific viewpoint and good illustrations of the principles. Excellent figures and example problems. Excellent homework problems.""The traditional coverage of atomic and molecular theory has always been a strong point of Principles of Modern Chemistry.""My opinion this is the ONLY text on the market that so methodically demonstrates an underlying connectivity between chemical processes, molecular structure, and energetics.""The greatest strength in this book is the mathematical rigor. Students learn in many ways and some need the mathematics. Too many of the general chemistry textbooks (even honors) seem to be taking out mathematics as a way to 'make the chemistry more understandable' instead of keeping the mathematics in and then describing the mathematics in an intuitive manner. The authors have worked on integrating the mathematics and the qualitative description. This has greatly improved the understandability of concepts."
Read more
About the Author
David W. Oxtoby became the ninth president of Pomona College on July 1, 2003. An internationally noted chemist, he previously served as dean of physical sciences at the University of Chicago. At Pomona, he holds a coterminous appointment as president and professor of chemistry. Before coming to Pomona, he was associated with the University of Chicago for nearly three decades, with brief interludes to serve as a visiting professor at such places as the University of Paris; the University of Bristol in Great Britain; and the University of Sydney in Australia. Oxtoby is a fellow of the American Physical Society and a member of the American Chemical Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. After earning his bachelor's degree, summa cum laude, from Harvard University, he went on to earn his Ph.D. at the University of California, Berkeley. As a research chemist, he is author or co-author of more than 165 scientific articles on such subjects as light scattering, chemical reaction dynamics and phase transitions. In addition to co-authoring Principles of Modern Chemistry and Chemistry: Science of Change, he has received fellowships from the Guggenheim, von Humboldt, Dreyfus, Sloan, Danforth and National Science foundations.
Read more
Product details
Hardcover: 1264 pages
Publisher: Cengage Learning; 8 edition (March 10, 2015)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1305079116
ISBN-13: 978-1305079113
Product Dimensions:
9 x 1.5 x 11 inches
Shipping Weight: 6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
3.7 out of 5 stars
43 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#197,330 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
I have been learning chemistry on my own for four years now because I like it. So far, I have purchased the following three chemistry textbooks, including Oxtoby's Principles of Modern Chemistry. I will comment on whether or not they are good for people like me; that is, a motivated self-learner and a career-changer who is motivated about mastering chemistry and learning it for fun, with the possibility of becoming a medical scientist and/or medical professional one day:(1) Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby (For those studying upper-level chemistry (such as, physical chemistry) and reviewing general chemistry; or, for those who have surpassed calculus-based physics in college)(2) Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change by Silberberg (Too Brief; no substance. Use it as a review book for grad school or MCAT for those with a science background) (3) General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry by Stoker (Too easy and too wishy-washy for self-learners of chemistry. You will read it and come to the end to find that it has no substance, yet understand some basic concepts. Use it in the winter as campfire fuel.)I spent 2010 - 2012 hacking at Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change by Silberberg. In the end I realized that every chapter is like an excerpt and a reference that cuts off what you really need to know, leaving a new learner baffled, even after studying basic chemistry. It offers quick spurts of chemistry while lacking quantity and quality. As a self-learner, I feel that this text is for those who are reviewing for graduate school or the MCAT.Next, In 2012, I spent 3 months reading General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry. Afterwards, I realized that it was too wishy-washy (it doesn't go deep into the subject). It only sells general concepts, but no math. It is good if you are scare of general chemistry, but it won't help you in the future. As a self-learner, I feel that this text is for a high school student who doesn't want to understand chemistry, but only the basic concepts of chemistry that barely scratch the surface.Then, on January 2, 2014, I received Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby. While looking over the first 20 pages, I noticed that the author said that "the book presupposes a solid high school background in algebra ad coordinate geometry" (pg xvi); however, this is not true. I am tired of some teachers or advisors telling me and other students who are learning for the JOY OF LEARNING SCIENCE, "Oh, you JUST need high school algebra," when this is not true. The minute you buy their course, you are like a frozen deer intrigued by the sight of the headlights of a truck coming your way; shocked by their ongoing display of formulas, and angered by their words that contributed to making the decision to buy the book in the first place.For Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby, the truth is that if you do not know the equation for FORCE (physics); and if the difference between the concepts of velocity, speed, momentum, displacement, acceleration, force and power, and weight and mass (physics again); and if you do not know what are exponential functions, logarithms and Summation Notations (college algebra and high school algebra); and if you do not know how to solve an equation and are uncomfortable with variables (beginning algebra (a.k.a. high school algebra); and if you are a picky learner like me who likes to learn in stages, mastering every detail like a dedicated martial arts student to his teacher, then this book is not your book. As a self-learner, I feel that this text is for those who are reviewing currently studying physical chemistry and want to review general chemistry at a higher level; or, for those who are preparing for graduate school or what to challenge themselves at a deeper level while preparing for the MCAT.For Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby, what you really need is an understanding in high school algebra, college algebra, trigonometry, calculus, physics and statistics is needed to truly understand and appreciate this book. He uses derivatives, anti-derivatives, integrals, statistics (such as probability functions, probability density, etc.). He uses trigonometric functions. Most of all, he uses physics. Even the most motivated student that is passionate about math, yet unfamiliar with physics and calculus will not understand.Suggestion for those like me: You can buy this book, look through all the mathematical and physical formulas that you need to learn, then use it for future reference after you have first mastered the following in order: Beginning Algebra 1 and 2, THEN College Algebra and Analytic Geometry, THEN Euclidian Geometry (2-D and some 3-D), THEN Trigonometry, THEN Pre-Calculus (just to make sure), THEN Calculus 1, Calculus 2, Calculus 3, THEN College Physics, THEN Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby. Maybe, even first use Chemical Principals, the Quest for Insight by Peter Atkins, and THEN use Oxtoby's Principles of Modern Chemistry for future reference in upper-level chemistry, like physical chemistry.in advance, I apologize if my grammar is bad. I am looking for a new chemistry book to buy. before going to bed I read Peter Atkin's "Reactions: The Private Life of Atoms." Looking over the PDF of his general chemistry books, my eyes are set to buy Peter Atkin's "Chemical Principals, the Quest for Insight" next. Notice that the reviews say "calculus-inclusive" not calculus intensive. So, Atkins' book, and then Oxtoby's book would work together (Oxtoby being used for when you study upper-level chemistry)
Do not buy this used. It doesn't say what the hell the "Hybrid" edition means in the description but it means that they don't print the practice problems. You need to use a one-time-use code to get online access to any of the practice problems that are printed in the hardcover edition. Deliberate false advertising.
Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby is the best textbook for teaching general (freshman) chemistry to chemistry majors; it would be a mistake to use it with non-majors or high school students. For non-majors, I recommend Chemistry by Chang or Chemistry the Central Science by Brown, et al.Principles of Modern Chemistry by Oxtoby is for the smart, well-prepared, self-disciplined student who has previously taken a chemistry class in high school. Oxtoby is a brilliant chemist; his textbook teaches chemistry at a higher level than any other freshman chemistry book. The book's treatment of quantum mechanics and bonding is peerless.While the chemistry (itself) is flawless, the writing, curriculum design, and presentation are often inadequate (in fact, pretty bad). The writing is often difficult to understand, even when one already knows the subject matter. In contrast, the chemistry textbooks by Chang and Brown are very easy to understand. In side by side comparisons, Chang explains the same topics much more lucidly and concisely than Oxtoby. Oxtoby should adopt the clear, lean writing style and information presentation techniques used in Chang.To perform a quick comparison for yourself, compare Oxtoby's Chapter 1 with Chang's chapter 2, in which the authors relate the history of our understanding of atomic structure. Chang's discussion is much better: his prose is easier to understand, more complete, better organized, more tightly focused (on message), and far more concise (he omits any information that does not support the learning objectives). In contrast, Oxtoby often leaves out vital information, includes extraneous information (which distracts student attention), sometimes wanders, and too often includes too much detail. Chang's text "chunks" and displays information optimally, thereby better focusing student attention and enhancing understanding and retention. Chang's text is also supplemented by online animations which improve learning. Chang uses all of the tools of modern learning theory, whereas Oxtoby is many decades behind the times.It spite of the book's shortcomings, Oxtoby teaches chemistry at a higher level than Chang or Brown; so if you aspire to be a better chemist, you should go through Oxtoby. In the end, perhaps the best learning tactic would be to read a topic in Chang or Brown, then study the topic in Oxtoby.When using Principles of Modern Chemistry, quite a lot of your chemistry education will occur through working the problems at the end of each chapter. Frequently, you will be required to answer problems without the benefit of seeing an example in the preceding text. In other words, part of your learning experience results from having to figure things out for yourself using concept synthesis and outside reading. This may be a new expectation for some public high school students, and may result in student anger and frustration. Instead of getting angry, buck-up and slog your way through all of the problems. You should definitely obtain the Student Solution Manual if you are using Oxtoby: you MUST work the end-of-chapter problems to learn the material.Principles of Modern Chemistry covers general chemistry at a higher cognitive level than any of the ten freshman chemistry books in my library. Its treatment of quantum mechanics and bonding is the most accurate for this level. If you ever take a course in quantum mechanics, you will come to understand that most freshman chemistry textbooks teach mental models (from "classical" chemistry) that are simply not correct (helpful, but not correct). In contrast, the authors of Principles of Modern Chemistry accurately teach the results of quantum mechanics, so you learn correctly from the very beginning. The illustrations of electron probability densities in this book are the best: they, alone, are reason enough to select this textbook. While the discussions of bonding in Chemistry by Brown are pretty good, and while the illustrations are good, Oxtoby is better.In the past few decades, many freshman chemistry books have been simplified to a level more appropriate for a chemistry laboratory technician than for a professional chemist. Not so with Principles of Modern Chemistry. Instead of starting this book with states of matter, thermodynamics, and basic wet-lab chemistry, this book spends first chapters creating a solid foundation by teaching chemical bonding based on quantum mechanics. While the book also covers the helpful (but obsolete) mental models of "classical" chemistry, it spends considerably more time covering the "modern" understanding of electron shells and bonding from quantum mechanics. With an accurate understanding of bonding, the chemistry student is then prepared to learn the balance of freshman chemistry at a higher level.While the book's "micro-to-macro" approach is optimum for the smart, well-prepared student, there is some down-side risk in following this approach. In the more traditional macro-to-micro approach (i.e., covering classical "wet" chemistry prior to quantum mechanics), the student gains more self-confidence (a sense of "I can do this!") and develops good learning habits. By starting out of the gate (so to speak) with bonding, a lot of students are going to conclude that the course is too difficult, and some may drop out as a consequence. By delaying quantum mechanics for one semester, you give the students time to transition to the more demanding college learning environment, and you give them time to finish one semester of calculus. The book has a "Teaching Options" section that addresses altering the sequence of presentation. For chemistry majors, I recommend teaching the subject matter in the order it occurs in the book (i.e., teach quantum mechanics and bonding first).This book is not for the beginner. The student who uses this textbook should have completed all of the following: (1) one year (preferably, two years) of high school chemistry, (2) one year of high school physics, (3) two years of high school algebra, and (4) one year of post-algebra math (with at least an introduction to calculus). Throughout the first four chapters, it is obvious that the authors assume they are addressing students who have already learned basic chemistry.The authors or someone at the publishing house should analyze the first four chapters of this book and prepare a detailed list of prerequisite knowledge and abilities (i.e., assumptions that have been made about what the student already knows). The Appendices in the back of the book provide good subject reviews; but the book does not have (but sorely needs) a chemistry review that covers all assumed pre-entry knowledge and abilities. There should also be a pre-test that verifies the student is academically prepared to start the course. I would recommend that chemistry professors who use this book administer such a test as a pre-condition to take the course.All students should review the first three appendices prior to or during the first week of class:- Appendix A: Scientific Notation and Experimental Error- Appendix B: SI Units, Unit Conversions, Physics for General Chemistry- Appendix C: Mathematics for General ChemistrySome reviewers have complained that the math in this textbook is too hard. Such comments disturb me: any student who has gained admission to college should have already mastered the required math. The math required to use this textbook includes: scientific notation, powers, logs, solving algebraic problems for one unknown variable, equations of a line (y = mx + b), slope of a straight line, quadratic equation, and very basic calculus (i.e., knowledge that a derivative is the slope of a curve and that an integral is the area under the curve).When calculus is used, the solutions are always provided. Calculus equations are printed in the book, but the student is never required to actually solve such problems; he or she is only needs to know (basically) the meaning of a derivative or integral. While the book covers the conclusions from quantum mechanics, it does not cover the math of quantum mechanics (not by a long chalk). While calculus equations are included in the text, there is no requirement for the student to learn how to derive or solve such equations. In short, if you know nothing about calculus, you can still get a grade of "A" in this course. Even so, you will understand some of the subject matter in this book much better if you know some calculus (either college calculus taken concurrently with this course or a year of AP calculus in high school). Of course, if you are a chemistry major, you should be taking a minor (or second major) in mathematics.One reviewer here stated that he used this textbook for a physical chemistry class. That is incredible (i.e., not credible). Principles of Modern Chemistry provides a beginner's overview of quantum mechanics, with only a "look at this" presentation of the mathematics. It does not even come close to a course in physical chemistry.If you didn't take chemistry in high school (or if you didn't do well in the class you did take), then you should avoid taking a class that uses this textbook. If you cannot avoid this situation, then obtain a copy of another freshman chemistry textbook (Chang, for example) and read the first third of that book during the first two weeks of the semester. Professors should consider using both Chang (or Brown) and Oxtoby, perhaps use Chang (or Brown), but place Oxtoby on reserve in the library.Alas, while Principles of Modern Chemistry gets an "A plus" for the chemistry, it gets a "C" for writing and a "C minus" for instructional design.The quality of writing is uneven: some sections are written admirably well, while other sections would get a failing grade in Freshman English. Chemistry by Chang consistently uses perfectly succinct, lucid, accurate, and eloquent prose. In contrast, in Principles of Modern Chemistry one sometimes encounters awkward wording, completely unnecessary (and sometimes bewildering) modifiers, and wandering paragraphs in need of a central topic. Chapters 1 through 3 of Oxtoby should be completely re-written. Chapter 1 goes into too much detail in its discussions of the history of our understanding of atomic structure. The book should rigorously maintain student focus on the learning objectives; all extraneous text, no matter how interesting to the professor, should be deleted.The authors of Principles of Modern Chemistry often failed to use simple techniques to display information in a format that captures attention and enhances memory and understanding. While this textbook has some wonderful illustrations, it could have significantly improved student learning by catering more to visual learning. Some folks learn substantially faster when information is presented visually (e.g., photos, illustrations, graphs, or tables) than when information is presented verbally (e.g., long paragraphs or spoken lectures). There are some great illustrations, tables, charts, graphics in this book, but there needs to be a lot more. I kept imagining how learning could have been improved by converting a long, confusing paragraph into a clear list, table, or illustration. The publishers should hand this book over to a professional instructional designer to modernize the information display.Compared to other freshman chemistry textbooks, the instructional "design" for this book is inadequate. I could write pages on the instructional design flaws in the textbook. Instead, I shall refer the authors to Thermodynamics by Cengel and Boles (the mostly nearly perfect college textbook ever written?). In brief, Oxtoby needs to: (1) better communicate instructional intent; (2) better sequence learning, so that prerequisite learning always occurs before a new topic is introduced; (3) eliminate all text that does not support the learning objective; (4) teach using "chunks" of information instead of pages of long, complicated, wandering paragraphs; and (5) change the presentation of information to enhance attention and memory.University chemistry professors spend years and years (maybe 15,000 to 20,000 hours, or more) becoming experts in their specific field of chemistry. Yet, when they get ready to write a textbook, they seem to spend little or no time learning instructional design or effective information display. I would highly recommend that professors take a 40 hour seminar in each of these areas. To get you started, read "Building Expertise" by Ruth Clark and any book by Mager. It would also be good for all chemistry professors to take a course on attention and memory from the psychology department.I wish the publisher would hire a professional curriculum designer (and associated staff) to write effective learning objectives, ensure text (and study problems) are meticulously matched to learning objects, identify and eliminate all subject matter that does not support the learning objectives, establish a list of prerequisite knowledge and abilities, develop an bank of multiple choice questions to verify prerequisite knowledge, and sequence and supplement the text to ensure prerequisite learning is always achieve before new topics are introduced. A professional instructional technologist could easily show the authors how to convert long, complicated, run-on prose into "chunked" displays, with supplemental illustrations, that focus attention and enhance memory. When all that is finished, this book need to be thoroughly edited by a chemist with a talent for clear, concise, understandable prose (maybe Chang could edit it?).Chapter 1 of this book reviews the history of ideas and experiments which eventually led to our modern understanding of atomic structure. This is NOT the best way to begin a chemistry class. Instead, the introduction of the book, and the first few days of freshman chemistry class, should be devoted to refreshing and verifying prerequisite knowledge - - - to establishing connections that will allow the students to bridge the gap between old learning and new learning. The first week is also used to exercise brains; therefore, the first chapter should be loaded with problems to solve. The authors should have identified all (assumed) prerequisite knowledge and abilities, and this list should have been used to create Chapter 1. Chapter 1 also needs to "sell" the idea of chemistry - - - to get the class upbeat and motivated. As written, Chapter 1 in Oxtboy is a distraction, not a vital part of the training. Refer to Chemistry by Chang for a good example of how to start a freshman chemistry course.While Chapters 1 through 3 of Oxtoby are pretty bad, the rest of the book is pretty good. The chapters on quantum mechanics and bonding are worth the price of the book all by themselves. Later chapters (e.g., the chapters on chemical equilibrium, acid-base reactions, solubility and precipitation, oxidation-reduction reactions, electrochemistry, etc.) are taught at a higher level than other freshman chemistry books. A student who comes out of a course based on Oxtoby will (potentially) be a much better chemist than a student who comes out of a course based on Chang and Brown.I have a long list of errata and a lengthy critique; but this review is already too long (so I shall spare you).In summary, if you are a chemistry major, this is the textbook for you. It is more challenging than other textbooks, but if you successfully meet the challenge, you will be a better chemist for it. I highly recommend supplementing this book with Chemistry by Chang or Chemistry the Central Science by Brown. If you are NOT a chemistry major (or an ambitious science major or pre-med), or if your grade point average is more important than your knowledge of chemistry, then I would recommend that you avoid any class that uses this book.
Used for school. Customer service was very poor in tracking a book needed for course.
Very good --thank you
If you looking to save buy the older version it has the same information just that schools are not allow to Sid it to students.
I'm a college student so I try to save when I can. I bought the used version of this book, and I would highly recommend buying the answer key to it too, my prof loved to test us on questions found at the back of each chapter, all he did was tweak the numbers and elements.Of course, we didnt cover the entire book, but this is as comprehensive as you need to get, unless you are doing some highly specialized chemistry. Good for acid/base topics all the way to quantum/Schrodinger's equations. One great chapter was the one of molecular orbitals, it had extremely helpful drawings/diagrams of how each orbital looked like, and graphs for electron distributions and electron densities.All in all, great book.
Wrong edition.
Principles of Modern Chemistry PDF
Principles of Modern Chemistry EPub
Principles of Modern Chemistry Doc
Principles of Modern Chemistry iBooks
Principles of Modern Chemistry rtf
Principles of Modern Chemistry Mobipocket
Principles of Modern Chemistry Kindle
